WORK JOURNAL FULL

The final decision and time to publication Reviewers and Senior Editors may request more than one revision of a manuscript, and alternative reviewers may also be invited to review the manuscript at any time. If necessary, revised manuscripts may be returned to the initial reviewers, usually within 1 month. Should the reviewers' reports contradict one another or a report is unduly delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought.

Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 60 days. We welcome suggestions for reviewers from authors, though these recommendations may or may not be used. Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise, and our referee database is constantly being updated. La Medicina del Lavoroemploys double-blind review, where both the referee and the author remain anonymous throughout the process. Those manuscripts deemed suitable for peer review are passed to at least 2 expert referees for review. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious conceptual and/or methodological flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal.Īuthors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will normally be informed within 10 days of assignment to the senior editor.įeedback is provided by the Senior Editor for all manuscripts rejected without review and, where possible, suggestions are made on other suitable publication outlets. When assigned a new submission, the Senior Editor will decide if it warrants peer review or if it should be rejected without review. Authors of manuscripts rejected at initial evaluation stage will normally be informed within 1 week of receipt. Those that pass are then assigned to a Senior Editor for consideration for sending for peer review.

WORK JOURNAL FULL

Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office.Īll new submissions are screened for completeness and adherence to the Guide for Authors. Special Issues have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors and/or Advisory Editors. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of La Medicina del Lavoro and manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below. It is a process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable journals. The practice of peer review is to ensure that manuscript is published.

Work journal